Here’s the Dunlop Biomimetic Tour CX. Bit of a strange head shape, eh?
Image via holabirdsports.com
Sponsored Links ↓
Buy (Canada): racquetguys.ca
Buy (UK): amazon.co.uk
Buy (US): amazon.com | racquetguys.com | squashgear.com
Product Notes
This guy is 135 grams, with an even balance. See also: The 2013 Dunlop Pro GTS 130, which is 5 grams lighter.
Spotted
Marwan El Shorbagy uses this. Here he is at the 2013 US Open:
Photo by Steve Cubbins ∞
There’s also the 2012 version of this same racket, which is still available:
Dunlop Biomimetic Tour CX Reviews
Have you tried this racket? If so, please leave a review in the comments below!
nick says
()
The 2012 version has been my main racket for a while now. I’m curious how 2013 model compares to 2012 model. Seems like frame shape has undergone major changes so they might be quite different feeling. Can anyone comment who’s used both? Thanks
nick says
()
i have the 2012 version of this racket. I like it a lot. I started using it coming from using very head light rackets. At first it seemed too slow and heavy but once I adjusted my swing (slower swing) then I really started digging it. Its strung weight is 165g…pretty much same like other “135g” rackets. “even” balance is very nice, very comfortable. I have it strung with 305+@23lbs and the ball really pops off with good control. i would say its a very relaxing racket to use.
JB says
()
I to use the 2012 model down to one and looking for the same replacement see the 2013-14 one anyone compared the two. Any other replacements with the same head shape. Is the Dunlop Elite now the same racquet? I have tried the Eye 120 but just not the same. Like the handle and frame shape. Any thoughts would be helpful. Thank you
PapaJ says
()
I had this racquet for about a couple of months. Very nice feel, nice for ‘touch’ players, but lacks power – at least for my liking.
It’s powerful enough if you’ve got a decent technique, it’s very light (135g is its official weight and that’s pretty much its playing weight), so if you know what you’re doing you can get some speed through the ball, but the racquet itself really lends itself to the ‘thinking game’ rather than the ‘power player’. The frame shape is a bit different too, I like the flatter tops on the head – and in any case, it has a fairly even feel across the strings with a large ‘sweet spot’ which is good.
The biggest issue for me is that it’s fragile. I broke mine with very little force on about it’s 10th game, some one else I know had one and it lasted just 3 hit-outs. Could have been dumb luck, but I would proceed with caution.
All in all, I wasn’t very happy with it, even before it broke. I think it will suit certain players more, it’s not a bad racquet by any stretch, but certainly at the retail price, I think you can find better balanced racquets; one that doesn’t sacrifice as much power for touch/feel as this one seems to, and one that is a bit tougher too.
Dani Roman says
()
Why is this racquet is so expensive, worth it?
And what’s the difference between this racquet and the dunlop pro gts 130 besides the weight and the frame shape?