Squash Source

Squash Equipment Blog

Home › Squash Rackets › Dunlop Squash Rackets › Dunlop Biomimetic Tour CX

Dunlop Biomimetic Tour CX

5 Comments

Here’s the Dunlop Biomimetic Tour CX. Bit of a strange head shape, eh?

Dunlop Biomimetic Tour CX 2013 Squash Racket
Image via holabirdsports.com

Affiliate Links

Squash Source receives a commission when you buy through these links. Thanks!

Buy (Canada): racquetguys.ca

Buy (UK): amazon.co.uk

Buy (US): amazon.com | racquetguys.com | squashgear.com

Search:
  • Amazon > Australia | Canada | France | Germany | Italy | Netherlands | Spain | UK | US
  • eBay > Australia | Canada | France | Germany | Netherlands | UK | US

Product Notes

This guy is 135 grams, with an even balance. See also: The 2013 Dunlop Pro GTS 130, which is 5 grams lighter.

Spotted

Marwan El Shorbagy uses this. Here he is at the 2013 US Open:

marwan-el-shorbagy-2
Photo by Steve Cubbins ∞


There’s also the 2012 version of this same racket, which is still available:

Dunlop Biomimetic Tour CX 2012

Affiliate Links

Squash Source receives a commission when you buy through these links. Thanks!

Buy (UK): amazon.co.uk

Search:
  • Amazon > Australia | Canada | France | Germany | Italy | Netherlands | Spain | UK | US
  • eBay > Australia | Canada | France | Germany | Netherlands | UK | US

Dunlop Biomimetic Tour CX Reviews

Have you tried this racket? If so, please leave a review in the comments below!

Filed Under: Dunlop Squash Rackets, Squash Rackets Tagged With: _Hide, Marwan El Shorbagy

REMOVE ADS

Remove ads, get your own login for commenting, and support Squash Source, all at the same time.

Comments

  1. nick says

    (December 21, 2016)

    The 2012 version has been my main racket for a while now. I’m curious how 2013 model compares to 2012 model. Seems like frame shape has undergone major changes so they might be quite different feeling. Can anyone comment who’s used both? Thanks

    Reply
  2. nick says

    (March 3, 2016)

    i have the 2012 version of this racket. I like it a lot. I started using it coming from using very head light rackets. At first it seemed too slow and heavy but once I adjusted my swing (slower swing) then I really started digging it. Its strung weight is 165g…pretty much same like other “135g” rackets. “even” balance is very nice, very comfortable. I have it strung with 305+@23lbs and the ball really pops off with good control. i would say its a very relaxing racket to use.

    Reply
    • JB says

      (September 22, 2018)

      I to use the 2012 model down to one and looking for the same replacement see the 2013-14 one anyone compared the two. Any other replacements with the same head shape. Is the Dunlop Elite now the same racquet? I have tried the Eye 120 but just not the same. Like the handle and frame shape. Any thoughts would be helpful. Thank you

      Reply
  3. PapaJ says

    (January 7, 2015)

    I had this racquet for about a couple of months. Very nice feel, nice for ‘touch’ players, but lacks power – at least for my liking.

    It’s powerful enough if you’ve got a decent technique, it’s very light (135g is its official weight and that’s pretty much its playing weight), so if you know what you’re doing you can get some speed through the ball, but the racquet itself really lends itself to the ‘thinking game’ rather than the ‘power player’. The frame shape is a bit different too, I like the flatter tops on the head – and in any case, it has a fairly even feel across the strings with a large ‘sweet spot’ which is good.

    The biggest issue for me is that it’s fragile. I broke mine with very little force on about it’s 10th game, some one else I know had one and it lasted just 3 hit-outs. Could have been dumb luck, but I would proceed with caution.

    All in all, I wasn’t very happy with it, even before it broke. I think it will suit certain players more, it’s not a bad racquet by any stretch, but certainly at the retail price, I think you can find better balanced racquets; one that doesn’t sacrifice as much power for touch/feel as this one seems to, and one that is a bit tougher too.

    Reply
  4. Dani Roman says

    (November 21, 2013)

    Why is this racquet is so expensive, worth it?
    And what’s the difference between this racquet and the dunlop pro gts 130 besides the weight and the frame shape?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Log in to your Squash Source account

This site uses cookies. Chomp. You can learn more about it in the Privacy Policy.

OK

x

 

x

Click here to get the Squash Source newsletter!

I send out an email about once a month. The newsletter contains a rundown of the latest squash equipment news and reviews from Squash Source.

WELCOME

Hi, I’m Pierre and I’ve been playing squash since I was a teenager. Here on Squash Source, you can get recommendations and reviews on squash equipment and find out what other players are using. Enjoy!

Squash Source Newsletter 😎

Subscribe

SUPPORT SQUASH SOURCE

When you buy through the Sponsored Links on this site, Squash Source earns a small commission. For example, as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at Amazon, at no extra cost to you. There are also ads around the site, but you can remove these by becoming a Squash Source supporter. Thank you for visiting!

QUICK LINKS

  • Squash Rackets
  • Squash Shoes
  • Squash Bags
  • Squash Balls
  • Squash Strings
  • Squash Goggles
  • Squash Grips
  • Squash Clothing
  • Squash Activity Trackers
  • Squash Gifts 🎄

© 2025 Pierre Bastien · All Rights Reserved · Impressum · Privacy Policy