Check out the new “Tecnifibre Dynergy AP” range of Tecnifibre squash rackets. These are launching in spring 2016 around the world.
This is a new frame design for Tecnifibre, with the strings looping around an arch in the throat of the racket (the AP stands for “arch power”). Prince squash rackets and Wilson squash rackets have used this type of design before; these Dynergy AP rackets represent Tecnifibre’s first foray into this frame shape.
All of the new Dynergy AP rackets will come strung with a new brand of Tecnifibre string called DNAMX. I haven’t posted about this string yet, but will do soon.
Tecnifibre are launching these with a bang: Miguel Angel Rodriguez, the charismatic Colombian, has already started using the Tecnifibre Dynergy AP 125, which is the lightest of the three.
These rackets will replace the previous Tecnifibre Dynergy rackets from a few years ago. Tecnifibre are keeping their other two lines, the Carboflex series (including the Tecnifibre Carboflex 125 S, used by Mohamed El Shorbagy and approximately 8 million other top pros) and the Suprem line, which have the traditional head shape.
Reviews
Here’s my video review of all three rackets! Thanks to Tecnifibre for providing these rackets to review.
Tecnifibre Dynergy AP 125
Tecnifibre Dynergy AP 130
Tecnifibre Dynergy AP 135
usman says
()
Hey this is Usman
I just bought my technifibre ap Dynergy, and I wanted to know how much gauge of strings are used in my racket
Someone please
Omer says
()
Their (Tecnifibre) website states it comes pre-strung with DNAMX 1.20
usman says
()
Thank you omer for your response Can you tell me one more thing what is the difference between 16 gauge, 17 gauge and 18 gauge, which one of the string in DNAMX should I buy????
Omer says
()
You’re welcome, Usman. I may not be able to give you the right answer but I’ll try. I’m sure Pierre will have something to say on this. The numbers 16, 17, and 18 refer to the gauge of the squash string; lower number implies thicker gauge and the higher number thinner gauge. Squash strings come in only two gauges, I think – 17 and 18. 17 is thicker and 18 is thinner. 17 gauge string’s diameter ranges from 1.16 mm to 1.25 mm, whereas 18 gauge string’s diameter range is 1.06 mm – 1.15 mm. (It means the Tecnifibre Dynergy AP 125 come pre-strung with 17 gauge DNAMX string.) Thicker gauge provides more durability but less power and thinner gauge provides more power but less durability. So, there’s a trade-off. Also, the power and durability depend on, in combination with the gauge, the tension at which the rackets are strung. I’ve only used stock DNAMX string in my Tecnifibre Dynergy AP 125, so I can’t say which one you should buy. There are other options available but someone else, who has used other strings, can give you a better opinion. Hope this help.
Pierre says
()
Yes Omer explained it well. DNAMX actually comes in a 16-gauge as well. I believe the Dynergy rackets come pre-strung with 17-gauge
Omer says
()
Hi everyone,
I recently broke my Tecnifibre Carboflex 125S and now searching for a new racket. The problem is that there is no way I can try a whole lot of rackets before I buy a new one. I tried Head Graphene Xenon 135 and Head Graphene XT Cyano 110. I felt that the 135 version provided more control while the 110 one was more powerful. But I also felt that the Head rackets in general are flexible and vibrate on contact with the ball (it could be due to my (faulty?) technique but I rarely felt the Carboflex 125S vibrating). I’m thinking of getting Tecnifibre Dynergy AP 125 but before I decide to get one I’d appreciate if Pierre or any of the other visitors could provide their feedback. Looking at the pictures of Dynergy AP 125, I’ve a feeling that due to its squarer shaft it would tend to vibrate more as compared to Carboflex 125S, which has a rounder shaft. But of course it’s just my feeling. One of the contributor on this site felt that this racket is chunky, which makes it difficult to dig the ball out of the corners. Anyhow, any guidance in terms of Dynergy 125’s comparison with Carboflex 125S would be welcome. Other options I have are Dynergy 117, Prince Pro Sovereign 650, and Prince Team Airstick 500 (but I haven’t tried these). Any help/advice/guidance/suggestion would indeed be greatly appreciated. By the way, I’m an average club-level player, thin frame, and I play 3-4 times a week. I’m not a power hitter.
Thanks.
Pierre says
()
Hi Omer, this is a tricky one as I didn’t think the Tecnifibre Dynergy AP 125 had much vibration, but then again I’ve used the Head Graphene Xenon 135 and never noticed much vibration there either. So I’m not sure if I can answer this too well.
Out of curiosity why are you switching away from the Tecnifibre Carboflex 125 S?
Omer says
()
Hi Pierre,
thanks for your reply. Like I said, it might be because of my inadequate technique that I felt vibrations when playing with Head rackets. Or it could be due to stock strings. But at the same I haven’t felt much vibration playing with Tecnifibre, Wilson, or Dunlop rackets. By the way, I have played with Wilson Fierce BLX, which I liked very much, Dunlop Aerogel 4D Elite, which didn’t suit my style of play at all as I got tennis elbow playing with it, and Tecnifibre Carboflex 125 S, which is a very nice racket. Anyhow, I decided to go with Tecnifibre Dynergy AP 125. Why I’m (have) switched away from Tecnifibre Carboflex 125 S? Well, I thought a slightly head heavy racket would suit my style of play (unfortunately, where I play, there aren’t many people who can give me solid advice, so it’s more of hit and trial procedure for me), so I decided to get this one. It is a nice racket but feels heavier than Carboflex 125 S. I have played with it for 2 days, though I like it as it has improved power in my shots but at the same time it is difficult to volley with this racket. In my opinion, it’s quite a forgiving racket and sweet spot appears to be larger too. But for anyone who is switching from a lighter, even-balanced racket, it would take some time to get used to this racket. And to be honest, I liked the cosmetics and design of this racket, so I really wanted to get this one :).
Once again, thanks for your reply.
Thomas Selway Spencer says
()
Don’t bother with the any prince racket under 750 power level. If you do, they have a lot more vibration and less feedback (generally) than the ones higher in the range.
Also, if you found that the carboflex felt good for you and did not vibrate, then you definitely want to go for a frame which is NOT stiff.
For most people this is the case with racket comfort, but the odd player finds that a very stiff racket (black knight ion, the graphene xt head cyanogen) feels more stable and has less vibration. This is down to technique and tightness of grip when hitting.
I have used a prince 850 black so and it’s equivalent for years, previously a carboflex, and am moving back to using tecnifibre again buy going for the dynergy ap 130.
Also, forget weight, it’s ALL about balance (unless your looking at a 150+ racket). I’ve used 110 rackets with the same balance at a 145 and they both feel the same for me.
Conversely, I’ve used 130’s with different balance and they are like chalk and cheese in terms of swing timing.
Arvind says
()
Hi Pierre
I’ve just wrecked my Head ix 120 racket , now looking to pick up a replacement . My other racket is a carboflex 130 and must say although did compromise with carboflex 125 am , very happy with it.
I was keen to know if i should go for the Dynergy AP 125 vs the Dynergy 117 as is there a significant variation . I’ve seen the review for both these , but a comparison btwn them would help .
Please do suggest
Pierre says
()
Hi Arvind, sorry, I’ve never tried the Dynergy 117 myself so can’t tell you much about the comparison
Ahsan says
()
Hi Pierre
Nice feedback and review.Just wanted to know if there was any difference you felt compared to the last version of Carbonflex 125 s and Dynergy AP 125?
Great to know your thoughts as a comparison.
Pierre Bastien says
()
Thanks Ahsan, I haven’t actually played much with the Carboflex 125 S but I borrowed a friend’s over the weekend for a few minutes and compared it with the Dynergy AP 125. I would say the Carboflex feels more flexible and the Dynergy more stiff. The Dynergy feels more substantial, with a thicker shaft.
Mubeen says
()
With the way Miguel uses this racket … it looks versatile and powerful but his own racket skill is also a factor on how the shots work out coming of the racket ! I do feel the AP is going to be a wonderful addition to the tecnifibre technology with the stiff shafts they have …. i look forward to using one !
jazz says
()
Hi, the new Tecnifibre rackets are already available in India. I can pick up the 125 for about USD 110, the MRP is about USD 150.The other 2 are 10 to 15% cheaper. I will order a 125 AP later today and hope to post my take on the racket early next week. Amazon.in says that this is the ” most powerful racket ” 🙂 Will find out soon enough.
jazz says
()
Hi
I received my Dynergy AP 125 and played with it over 2 days.
A very good racket for Power and control. I like it more than the Carboflex 125.
The balance is
0.05 mm more towards the head but feels light, smooth and very quick. A much bigger sweet spot and easy to use.
The beauty of this racket is that getting the ball out of the corners / hitting boasts is much easier, you do not need to go hard for the ball. You will need to understand the head angles to use and reasonable racket head speed ( swing ) will get you winners.
There is a lot in the racket and you need to practice and learn ” what else it can do “.
I would use this for a good game or match. My other go to racket for unmatched aggression is Head Graphene Cyano XT 135 with Head Evolution Pro strings.
I paid USD 110 for the Dynergy AP 125.
Gordon says
()
Can you tell me in what store did you get it? Thanks
Ibrahim says
()
Huge price difference between the 3 versions. I was interested in buying the AP 135 but just noticed it is pre-strung with synth gut. The 130 & 125 are strung with the new DNAMX.
Pierre Bastien says
()
I’m seeing some conflicting information on this. I will try and find out more.
Pierre says
()
I checked out the demos and the 135 was indeed strung with synthetic gut: